
I agree with Professor Edwen Chemerinsky that a change to the Electoral College system to conform to the constitution for equal representation is needed. However that just leads to another problem with the House of Representatives. The house membership was set at 435 members in 1912. So if we were to change the rules on the house to meet this same standards of the constitution today we could wind up with a 1000 members? The problem with a 1000 members would be an enormous expense to the tax payers and turn the house into chaos or at best grid lock. So whats the trade off. Leave it like it is or turn the house into chaos.
Joseph B.D. Saraceno