Does Francis Really Love Children and the Family?
By Randy Engel

Francis Intent on Perpetuating “Sex Education”
Challenge indeed! Not only does Francis promote that which was formally forbidden in the pre-conciliar Church, he also reinforces a phrase taken from the Final Report of the Synod on the Family (October 24, 2015) which states that “a new and more appropriate language “is needed “in introducing children and adolescents to the topic of sexuality.”
Recalling the Reverend Jonathan Swift’s adage, “You can’t make a silk purse of a sow’s ear,” Francis, like so many post-conciliar prelates, is attempting to turn something which is evil and vicious – in origin, in intent and in practice – and transform it into something which is good and even virtuous.
The Antilife Origins of “Sex Education”
There is no mystery about the diabolical origins of “sex education,” as noted above.
In my first book, Sex Education – The Final Plague written in 1989 at the peak of the prolife war against sex initiation programs in Catholic and public schools, I described the antilife roots of the movement, its antilife leadership, its antilife objectives and its antilife methodologies and documented the tortuous and deceptive route by which “sex education” came into parochial schools following the Second Vatican Council.
Neither is there any mystery about what “sex education” is designed to accomplish.
According to Dr. Richard Day, a former National Medical Director of Planned Parenthood-World Population, the real purpose of “sex education” is to get children interested in sex at an early age and have them make the connection between sex and the need for contraception early in their lives, even before they become sexually active. In a 1969 speech on the coming “New World System (Order)” Day insisted that sex must be separated from reproduction and reproduction from sex.
Following the U.S. Supreme Court decision of January 22, 1973, Dr. Alan Guttmacher,, another Planned Parenthood official, was asked by a reporter for the Washington Star News how Roe vs. Wade could be made absolutely secure, once and for all. Guttmacher responded with two words, “sex education.”
If Francis had just conducted a modicum of research on his own, he would have discovered that securing “abortion rights” is but one of the many “rights” “sex education” is guaranteed to secure including:

The “right” to contracept.
The “right” to sterilize oneself and the retarded.
The “right” to commit adultery, and to trial marriage and divorce.
The “right” to eugenic breeding, i.e., artificial insemination and surrogate motherhood.
The “right” to suicide and euthanasia, i.e., to kill oneself and others who are ill.
The “right” to infanticide, i.e., to kill mentally and physically handicapped babies.
The “right” to eugenic abortion, i.e., to kill the handicapped unborn child.
The “right” to free access to pornography.
The “right” to all forms of sexual expression including masturbation, sodomy, incest, bestiality, and sadomasochism.
The “right” to pederasty and pedophilia so that children and youth can engage in “creative” sexuality.
The “right” to commercial sex, i.e., male and female prostitution, as well as heterosexual, homosexual, transgender and surrogate sex therapy and reconstructive surgery.
The “right” of the State to implement programs of population control, both voluntary and compulsory.

Throughout the lengthy text of Amoris Laetitia, Francis uses terms such as “virtue,” “modesty,” “chastity,” “commitment,” “respect,” “fertility,” but “sex education,” often sold to Catholic parents as “family life education,” points the child and youth in the opposite direction because:

“Sex Education” is not about God or the Natural Law. It is about sexual idolatry.
It is not about virtue. It’s about vice.
It is not about morality. It’s about immorality.
It is not about chastity and modesty. It’s about the cannibalism of innocence and purity.
It is not about the facts if life, but rather about death and killing.
It is not about fecundity. It’s about sterility.
It is not about love. It’s about achieving genital stimulation and release.
It is not about respect and honor. It’s about dishonor and infidelity.
It is not about family life, but about the destruction of the family and the undermining of parental authority.

In short, “sex education” is anti-educational, anti-child and anti-family.  It is a form of sexual conditioning and “reconstructive psychotherapy” designed to deform youthful consciences and turn young people into sexual robots and polymorphous perverts. It is a legalized form of child seduction and molestation.
Is it any wonder that the post-conciliar popes and the majority of American bishops have demonstrated such a callus lack of concern for victims of clerical sexual abuse?
Why should Catholic parents be surprised? The American bishops have permitted hundreds of millions of Catholic school children to be mentally and spiritually raped under the guise of “family life instruction” for more than half a century.
After thirteen years of classroom sex instruction which destroys the latency period of the young, arrests normal sexual development in adolescents, and breaks down sexual inhibitions and feelings of revulsion for sexual perversions including masturbation, homosexuality, and pornography to which children and youth are systematically exposed, Catholic school children are so damaged, that barring a miracle of grace, they cannot but find themselves unfit to lead a truly holy Catholic life as adults, be they single, married or religious.
(To be continued)

For more from Randy Engel go to: https://akacatholic.com/