I sent this to traditio@traditio.com  and they ignored it. I asked them to PROVE to me that Francis was ordained in the new rite. They never responded.

Most countries were not in a hurry to adopt the new rites. In “The Order of Melchisedech” by Michael Davies (1995) states that the episcopate of Argentina had refused to adopt these new rites. When they finally adopted them is unknown but most certainly after 1969. This would conclude that Jorge Bergoglio was in fact ordained according to the traditional rite for priests. As for the new rite of consecration of a Bishop, no one can say dogmatically that it’s not a valid rite. I’ve read it through and compared it to the old rite and found it having the same basic wording only in a different arrangement and valid to me. If you go back to the time of the Apostles there was very little formality in consecrating a Bishop or an Apostle..

In Hawthorne, CA. my church of St. Josephs did not adopt the new Mass until 1971. I was there when the changes took place and even saved one of the original Missalettes. So they disobeyed pope Paul VI edict,  on the time table, as well…So did a lot of countries.

In Christ, Joseph