Modernists & Masons hijacked the Church and created a “New Church” which the Remnant are apart of and the Neo-SSPX apparently wants to follow. After all the continued evidence is there. Recently, James Vogel of the Angelus Press, was present at the latest Pseudo Trad Ecumenical Conference in Weirton. The Neo-SSPX continues to forge alliances with these betrayers (as Archbishop Lefebvre put it) and even recently published an article from Michael Matt. And who can doubt this new position of the Neo- SSPX which handed over a heretical/schismatic document in 2012 which accepted Vatican II, the New Mass and the new Code of Canon Law and still has not been officially retracted. The evidence is there my friends but how so many choose to remain obstinate! Archbishop Lefebvre said of  “the Remnants” work/position that it is a “poisonous osmosis” and yet pseudo traditionalism remains another novelty of the hour! If the Neo-SSPX would actually follow what their own founder taught instead of listening and following the Remnant perhaps they might have been able to escape, in part, the crisis, which continues to dismantle the Neo-SSPX into a “deeper” pseudo traditionalism. Why are individuals so taken away by the exterior beauty when the interior, that is, the doctrine, is not Catholic?Attending a Latin Mass whose priest accepts Vatican II (as a whole) and its modernism is unacceptable to any Catholic, therefore, why is it any different for one who would offer/attend a Novus Ordo “New Mass”?

Still further, what the Remnant fails to mention is how the New Mass once launched was indeed invalid due to the changing of the Words of Consecration which changed the Form of the Sacrament (condemned, Catechism of Trent). This was later corrected byBenedict XVI and yet does not take away that it is still illicit/schismatic and mortal sin to attend. This recent piece only is further evidence to support the “fence-sitting” Remnant’s position on Vatican II that is was actually “Catholic” with just some errors in it.  They would attempt very impotently to suggest there is a real council and then a council contrived by the liberal media which has distorted this modernist “council”