Views on the AntiChrist by Father George de Nantes and the Rev. Father P. Huchede

GEORGE DE NANTES
Fr. Georges de Nantes
This article was written in the “Catholic,” in the June-July 1999  issue. At that time it was in control of the Editor S. Don McLean and printed out of Australia. The SSPX group in Great Britain now controls the paper. This article was written by Fr. de Nantes in May 1963.
I have been asked whether I think the Antichrist is a person or a theory. I am not a prophet nor am I charged with the interpretation of prophecy. It may well be that he is a man of Satan who will precede the return of Christ Jesus, that is the meaning of his title, ‘Antchrist’, and this seems to be affirmed by Holy Scripture. But it will also, of necessity, be a mass movement and an ideology of extraordinary power both political and spiritual. We have learned from our Lord not to tremble before such prospect, but to hold fast to our faith in Him, as we await the return of our only Savior, “coming on the clouds of heaven just as He ascended there.” The important thing is not to let ourselves to be lead astray, for the Antichrist will seduce Christians themselves and will thus come close to total victory. A new Christianity, updated and transposed.
That is to say that he will present himself as a replica of Christ, another Christ, and his doctrine will be presented like a new Christianity, updated and transposed.
That is to say that he will present himself as a replica of Christ, another Christ, and his doctrine will be presented like a new Christianity, updated and improved, but modeled nevertheless on the authentic doctrine to such an extent that the elect themselves will be taken in by it, unless God preserves them from this.
(A perfect prophecy of the Vatican II Council and church)
From his booklet, the “History of Antichrist,” first printed in 1884-1968 by Tan, the Rev. P. Huchede explains that all the Fathers and theologians concur in this belief as to Antichrist individuality. Evidently we are rapidly drifting towards the time when all nations will blend in one universal fusion of political unity…In fifty years hence the possibility of the political empire of the empire of Antichrist is evidently quite feasible. He alludes to the Antichrist being a Jew but that’s conjecture because of the Jewish symbols related to him as, being from the tribe of Dan. Dan broke away from Israel and would be considered as the future Judas. In speaking to the Jews on his way to the Crucifixion our Lord said, “I come in the name of my Father, and you receive me not; if another shall come in his own name, him you will receive.” speaking of the Antichrist. During the end times the majority will continue to lead disorderly lives, just like those who lived in the time of Noe. They shall continue to indulge in all kinds excesses of intemperance and luxury until they will be surprised of the deluge of fire that will envelope and devour them…..It is probable that our resurrection will take place on Easter Sunday; such is the opinion of Lactance (lib.7, C.19) and of St. Anselm (Elucid.) If there will be an interval of forty-days between the death of Antichrist and our resurrection, the death of Antichrist must take place during the days of debauchery which precede the holy time of lent….And then shall appear the sign of the Son of Man in Heaven; and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn. “The Fathers believe that this sign is the cross, and the Church chants it in her scared liturgy. On page 59, Father Huchede alludes to the Antichrist reign beginning in 1951 and lasts till 1953. Well one fact worth mentioning here is that all of the Vatican II popes were in the world at that time, so lets give him credit for that much, for sure.
I have 7 of these booklets available for anyone who would want a copy. Their $4.00 each and $1.00 postage. send to: Joseph B. D. Saraceno 17024 S Western Ave # 8, Gardena, CA. 90247
I was just noteicing an add for the book, St. Vicent Ferrer—“Angel of the judgment,” in the Ignitus press where they state that, “Our Lord told him the world would have ended had he not obeyed Christ’s commission to preach.” Will I hardly think not as the world can not end until the conclusion of the Syncretistic, V-2 teaching and the secular democracy spreads through out the world and the final AntiChrist is on ST. Peter’s chair.
P.S. If you notice that I always Capitalize the Christ in AntiChrist and the reason for that is because he will have to be a priest.
In Christ, Joseph