Objection I: Pope Pius XII lifted all ecclesiastical penalties during the conclave to elect the pope. So even if the Vatican II popes were heretics before their elections, they would still be validly elected.
Answer: Heretics and schismatics are barred by DIVINE LAW from the election to the Papal Office. Pope Pius XII lifted ecclesiastical penalties; he did not, would not, could not dispense from Divine Law. Proof: MORE
On November 19, 1969 The Owosso Argus-Press reported that Pope (Paul VI) defends new rites:
VATICAN CITY (AP) – Pope Paul VI defended controversial new rites for the Roman Catholic Mass today and said all Catholics “must promptly adhere” to them. His words, at his regular general audience, met recent criticism by Antonio Cardinal Bacci and Alfredo Cardinal Ottaviani, two semiretired conservative members of the Roman Curia, who had suggested the new Mass was almost “heretical”.
This is not just about the MASS. It’s life or death for the Catholic Church. The New Bible’s make Jesus just another prophet. And the Council teaches # 9., one can be saved in ANY Religion. We need to join up together and preach the Coming of the Lord, and stop calling these AntiChrists popes. This is the “Great Apostasy” St. Paul talked about. Go to www.catholicendtimetruths.com then to Books, why Sede Vacante & Apostasy and the Beast.
One would have to be a nitwit not to understand that we have very little time left in this world.
Grace be with you, in Christ, Joseph B.D. Saraceno
Slap the face of one of the two witnesses, the Prophet Elias – Mt. Carmel was his dwelling-place. A Slap in the face for SSPX – their negotiations are out the door. And most Catholics slap Traditionalists in the face, they’d rather turn Protestant instead of searching for the Truth. And who’ll consecrate Russia? What does that even mean any more? Those who are stuck in the Fatima crusade, I have news for you, Russia’s more religious then the U.S. and the WHOLE world! Pray for your own country’s conversion.
The Vatican’s Secretariat of State has issued an instruction regarding the celebration of Mass in St. Peter’s Basilica, suppressing Masses said by a priest by himself, and restricting the celebration of the extraordinary form of Mass in the Latin rite to one altar in the crypt of the basilica. MORE
The Robber Council of 1962-1965 (better known to the world as the Second Vatican Council), produced sixteen heretical documents. Four of those documents were “promulgated” by Montini (“Pope” Paul VI) on December 7, 1965, the day before the Council ended. Altogether, Vatican II passed four Constitutions, nine Decrees, and three Declarations. Two of the four Constitutions were called “Dogmatic” (Dei Verbum [on Divine Revelation], and Lumen Gentium [on the Church]), and the last was labeled as “Pastoral,” Gaudium et Spes (On the Church in the Modern World). The Constitution Sacrosanctum Concilium [on the liturgy] does not specify itself with either appellation. Gaudium et Spes (translated as “Joy and Hope,” will hereinafter be referred to as “GS”), was one of those last four documents put out by the Council. It is most pernicious and often overlooked because of the more glaring heresies of the other Constitutions. MORE
Dear friends of the Faith without exception, False Prophets always tell people what THEY want to hear. This article was printed in the “Reign of Mary.” A CMRI publication.in Fall 2018 under the title of “As Sheep Not Having a Shepherd.” I got a hold of it about six months ago and just couldn’t respond until now. You will see that, in some cases he even contradicts the Bishop of CMRI. Because it’s about six pages long I have taken the liberty to high light those places that contain the most serious errors and explain each one here.
In Christ, Joseph 8-7-20 St. Cajetan,C
The Great Apostasy, precedes the reign of Antichrist.
Explanation of Church Teaching on Papal Infallibility ~ by Rev. Fr. Noel Barbara RIP
Hear, Father Noel Barbara’s dynamic lecture, given originally in French by Fr. Barbara in the 1980’s. The author (who was probably the first European priest to come to the conclusion of the vacancy in the papal chair), after recalling the Catholic doctrine on the Church and its Magisterium, shows why the popes of Vatican II cannot be popes.
January 24, 2020 – St. Timothy, Bishop & Martyr Double Feast
The Apostolic Succession Is Now Almost Dead in Newchurch. There Are only Forty Old Bishops Who Were Validly Consecrated before 1968
From: Petrus Romanus, The TRADITIO Network’s Roman Correspondent
That I know of, this is one “simony” accusation in the last 50 years was never made public among Traditional Catholics. So please, tell me your source and what CMRI Father’s agree with these accusations towards pope John XXIII??? What about our Bishop? I never heard him say anything on it this.
Do I understand you correctly that pope John XXIII bought or paid to be pope?
Dear Friends in Christ, Jesus.
Faith is often tried and made strong in times of hardship. A case in point is the present Great Apostasy. Because of the Great Apostasy that has changed the Church forever into a very small flock as opposed to the great number that has apostatized and those that have been led into schism by false teachers, the remnant of the Church is often physically isolated from other members of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church.
A review of “The Problem of Authority in the Post conciliar Church – the Cassiciacum Thesis” by Father Bernard Lucien.
In this review, I would wish to proceed through the Cassiciacum Thesis of Msgr. Guerard des Laurier as presented by Rev. Bernard Lucien and translated by Rama P. Coomaraswamy, M.D., step by step, but time does not allow. Be that as it may, one must first skip to the conclusion in order to put into perspective the outcome of their conclusions. I will return to the Thesis afterwards.
I begin by quoting from the Chapter “Conclusion:”
The attached link is another attempt by those Cassiciacum Thesis, prelates and you could add some sede vacante’s who are trying to convince themselves that the church will always remain intact until Christ comes back. The basis for this is, “The Gates of hell shall not prevail against it,” that the powers of Hell would not prevail against the church is at least a valid interpretation of the text.